Poster Presentation New Zealand Association of Plastic Surgeons Annual Scientific Meeting

A Review of the Recent Developments in Skin Substitutes for Burn Wound Management (1724)

Anna Dargan 1
  1. Middlemore Hospital, Papatoetoe, AUCKLAND, New Zealand

Dermal regeneration templates (DRTs) are permanent skin substitutes used in the management of skin defects after the excision of burns or release of burn wound contractures. The goals of skin substitutes are the prevention of wound infection, maintenance of moist environment, and replacement of normal skin to restore function and aesthetics. DRTs provide a scaffold to replace the dermis, and support epidermal autografting. Despite constant evolution in the development of skin substitutes, no single product stands out as the gold standard for the treatment of burns.

For many years, Integra has been used as a biological dermal substitute for burns that extended through the dermis. Although a useful dermal regeneration template, Integra is not without the risk of infection, including reported cases of toxic shock syndrome in secondary burn reconstruction patients. NovoSorb Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix (BTM) is a recent addition to the surgical toolbox that temporises the wound and biodegrades after integration and establishment of dermal elements. Comparatively, BTM provides a synthetic DRT option, which offers a thick, durable framework for reconstruction, which is more resistant to infection.

Although the use of DRTs is a significant step in the reconstruction of severe burns, they still require autografting to replace the epidermis, unlike some of the bioengineered dermal-epidermal skin substitutes in development, and this can be problematic in patients with limited donor sites.  As BTM is becomes more widely used, the logical progression is to explore definitive wound closure alternatives, such as autologous skin cell suspension and cultured epithelial autografts over a widely meshed split thickness skin graft.

This paper will review the literature on the use of DRTs for burn management, including the findings of the recent transition to the use of BTM for severe burns, and future options including cultured epithelial autografts over DRTS and dermal-epidermal substitutes.

 

  1. Haddad, Anthony G, Giatsidis, Giorgio, Orgill, Dennis P & Halvorson, Eric G. 2017. Skin substitutes and bioscaffolds: temporary and permanent coverage. Clinics in plastic surgery 44: 627-634.
  2. Hill, David M, Hickerson, William L & Carter, Jeffrey E. 2023. A risk-benefit review of currently used dermal substitutes for burn wounds. Journal of Burn Care & Research 44: S26-S32.
  3. Palackic, Alen, Duggan, Robert P, Campbell, Matthew S, Walters, Elliot, Branski, Ludwik K, El Ayadi, Amina & Wolf, Steven E. 2022. The role of skin substitutes in acute burn and reconstructive burn surgery: an updated comprehensive review. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc..
  4. Gonzalez, Santiago R & Yuen, James C. 2020. Integra dermal regeneration template as the nidus of staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome: A case report. JPRAS open 25: 24-29.
  5. Shirley, Rebecca, Teare, Louise, Dziewulski, Peter, Frame, James, Navsaria, Harshad & Myers, Simon. 2010. A fatal case of toxic shock syndrome associated with skin substitute. Burns 36: e96-e98.
  6. Gonzalez, Santiago R, Wolter, Keith G & Yuen, James C. 2020. Infectious complications associated with the use of Integra: a systematic review of the literature. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery–Global Open 8: e2869.
  7. Petrie, Kyla, Cox, Cameron T, Becker, Benjamin C & MacKay, Brendan J. 2022. Clinical applications of acellular dermal matrices: a review. Scars, Burns & Healing 8: 20595131211038313.
  8. Pereima, Mauricio José Lopes, Feijó, Rodrigo, da Gama, Fabiana Oenning & de Oliveira Boccardi, Roberto. 2019. Treatment of burned children using dermal regeneration template with or without negative pressure. Burns 45: 1075-1080.
  9. Germain, L, Larouche, D, Nedelec, B, Perreault, I, Duranceau, L, Bortoluzzi, P, Beaudoin Cloutier, C, Genest, H, Caouette-Laberge, L & Dumas, A. 2018. Autologous bilayered self-assembled skin substitutes (SASSs) as permanent grafts: a case series of 14 severely burned patients indicating clinical effectiveness. Eur Cell Mater 36: 128-141.
  10. Dearman, Bronwyn L & Greenwood, John E. 2022. Long-term follow-up of a major burn treated using composite cultured skin. Burns Open 6: 156-163.
  11. Hammer, Daniel, Rendon, Juan L, Sabino, Jennifer, Latham, Kerry, Fleming, Mark E & Valerio, Ian L. 2017. Restoring full‐thickness defects with spray skin in conjunction with dermal regenerate template and split‐thickness skin grafting: a pilot study. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine 11: 3523-3529.
  12. Greenwood, J. E. (2017). The evolution of acute burn care–retiring the split skin graft. The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 99(06), 432-438.
  13. Heard, Jason, Sen, Soman, Greenhalgh, David, Palmieri, Tina & Romanowski, Kathleen. 2023. Use of Cultured Epithelial Autograft in Conjunction with Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix in Massive Burns: A Case Series. Journal of Burn Care & Research 44: 1434-1439.
  14. Larson, Kenneth W, Austin, Cindy L & Thompson, Simon J. 2020. Treatment of a full-thickness burn injury with NovoSorb biodegradable temporizing matrix and RECELL autologous skin cell suspension: a case series. Journal of Burn Care & Research 41: 215-219.
  15. Gibson, Angela LF. 2023. Living Skin Substitute Tissue—Is a Replacement for the Autograft Possible?. European Burn Journal 4: 492-500.